Abstract
Health apps and other consumer technologies collect massive amounts of sensitive data, including but not limited to information about users’ reproductive lives. As a result, consumer choices—especially for menstruation tracking applications—are at least partly driven by privacy promises in advertising and privacy policies. But there is a problem: whether these promises are grounded in reality can often only be revealed by complex analyses outside the capabilities of the majority of consumers and, even then, may be unknowable in any definitive sense. This essay explores this problem in the context of menstruation tracking applications and post-Dobbs legal developments that implicate reproductive data. In it, we question the adequacy of existing laws and regulations and the limitations of even the most robust proposed legislation and underscore that if we cannot solve the problem of privacy lies, any hard-fought reforms will be hollow.
Recommended Citation
Rash, Andy and Fowler, Leah R.,
LIES, DAMN LIES, AND PRIVACY PROMISES,
64 Santa Clara L. Rev.
323
(2024).
Available at: https://digitalcommons.law.scu.edu/lawreview/vol64/iss1/6
Archival Accessibility Statement
This item was created or digitized prior to May 1, 2026, or is a reproduction of legacy media created before that date. It is preserved in its original, unmodified state specifically for research, reference, or historical recordkeeping. In accordance with the ADA Title II Final Rule, the Law Library provides accessible versions of archival materials upon request. To request an accommodation for this item, please submit an accessibility request form.
