This series contains legal materials that are of historical, or topical, interest. This collection is also used as a hosting area for materials to support faculty empirical research and scholarship. For analysis of these materials, refer to Professor Eric Goldman's Technology & Marketing Law Blog.

Follow

Submissions from 2020

PDF

Huffman v. Activision Publishing, Eastern District of Texas

PDF

INFORMED CONSENT ACTION NETWORK v YouTube, Northern District of California

PDF

In re Facebook, Inc and Facebook, Inc d/b/a Instagram, Texas Supreme Court

PDF

In re Michael Lacey, Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals

PDF

Isaac v. Twitter, Southern District of Florida

PDF

Jim Adler v. Angel Reyes, Northern District of Texas

PDF

Jim S Adler PC v McNeil Consultants, Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals

PDF

JOHN PAUL SZYMKOWICZ v. MICHAEL STUART FRISCH, District Court of District of Columbia

PDF

Johnson v. Amazon.com, Western District of Oklahoma

PDF

Jones v. Google, Kansas County Court

PDF

Jones v. Twitter, District of Maryland

PDF

Jones v. Twitter, District of Maryland

PDF

KGS v. Facebook, U.S. Supreme Court

PDF

Klein v. Facebook, Northern District of California

PDF

Kober v. Google, Cal. Superior Ct.

PDF

Lacoste v. Instagram, Central District of California

PDF

Larsen v. Apple, Northern District of Alabama

PDF

Leaf v. Nike, Eastern District of Michigan

PDF

Leaf v. Nike, Eastern District of Michigan

PDF

LeFever v. Airbnb, District of Puerto Rico

PDF

Lemmon v. Snap, Central District of California

PDF

Lewis v. Google, Western District of Pennsylvania

PDF

Leyva v. Robbins, District of Utah

PDF

Lindemer v. Polk County, District of Minnesota

PDF

Loomer v. Facebook, Southern District of Florida

PDF

Lukis v. Whitepages, Northern District of Illinois

PDF

Mahon v. Alphabet, Northern District of California

PDF

Mahon v YouTube, Northern District of California

PDF

Malwarebytes v Enigma, US Supreme Court

PDF

Managematics v. eBay, District of Massachusetts

PDF

McCoy v. Alphabet, Northern District of California

PDF

McCready v. Google, District of District of Columbia

PDF

McNamara v. Google, Northern District of California

PDF

McQueen v. Amazon, Northern District of California

PDF

Mehta v. Robinhood, California Superior Court

PDF

Mercado v. eBay, Northern District of California

PDF

Miller v. 4Internet, District of Nevada

PDF

Miller v. 4Internet, District of Nevada

PDF

Miller v. Facebook, District of District of Columbia

PDF

Miracle Drops v. MC Shakie, Eastern District of Louisiana

PDF

Mishiyev v. YouTube, Northern District of California

PDF

Miyokos v Ross, Northern District of California

PDF

ML v craigslist, Western District of Washington

PDF

ML v craigslist, Western District of Washington

PDF

Molander v. Google, Northern District of California

PDF

Moore v. Equifax, Eastern District of Missouri

PDF

Moran v. Face Book, Central District of California

PDF

Mosha v. Facebook, New York Supreme Court

PDF

Murphy v. Twitter, California Appeals Court

PDF

NeuralMagic v. Facebook, District of Massachusetts

PDF

Newman v. Distrokid, Central District of California

PDF

Newman v. Google LLC, Northern District of California

PDF

New Mexico v. Google, District of New Mexico

PDF

Nunes v. Twitter, Virginia Circuit Court

PDF

Olson v. Airbnb, Indiana Circuit Court

PDF

Owens v. Lead Stories, Delaware Superior Court

PDF

Paige v. Google, District Court of District of Columbia

PDF

Palka v. Automattic, Northern District of California

PDF

Peekya v. Google, Northern District of California

PDF

Pellegrino v. Epic Games, Eastern District of Pennsylvania

PDF

Pellegrino v. Epic Games, Eastern District of Pennsylvania

PDF

Peterson v. Nike, Central District of Utah

PDF

Plotkin v. The Astorian, District of Oregon

PDF

Preventing Online Censorship Executive Order Redline, White House

PDF

Proposition 24, California Secretary of State

PDF

Pure Sweat Basketball v. Google, Northern District of California

PDF

Ray Henderson Music v. Google, Northern District of California

PDF

REPLY COMMENTS OF CO-AUTHORS OF SECTION 230 OF THE COMMUNICATIONS ACT OF 1934, Federal Communications Commission

PDF

Reveal Chat Holdco v. Facebook, Northern District of California

PDF

Reyes v. Tanaka, District of Hawaii

PDF

Richards v. Weeks, Florida Circuit Court

PDF

Ridenti v. Google, District of Massachusetts

PDF

Rivera v. Marriott, District of Puerto Rico

PDF

RJ v Facebook, New Jersey Superior Court

PDF

Roberson v. Clearview AI, Eastern District of Virginia

PDF

Roberts v. Google, Northern District of California

PDF

Rock the Vote v. Trump, Northern District of California

PDF

Rodriguez v. Google, Northern District of California

PDF

Rothchild Investment v. Facebook, Georgia County Court

PDF

ROYAL DISPOSABLE MEDICAL & SAFETY SUPPLIES, INC. v. GOOGLE LLC, District Court of District of Columbia

PDF

Rupp v. Courier Journal, Western District of Kentucky

PDF

Saint Paulus Lutheran Church v. Zoom, Northern District of California

PDF

SA Music v. Google, Northern District of California

PDF

SA Music v. Google, Northern District of California

PDF

Sanchez v. Facebook, Southern District of New York

PDF

Sanders v. Google, California Superior Court

PDF

San Francisco Comprehensive Tours v. TripAdvisor, District of Nevada

PDF

Schneider v. YouTube, Northern District of California

PDF

Schroeder v. Volvo, Central District of California

PDF

Section 230 Letter from 46 Academics, Eric Goldman

PDF

Seward v. Airbnb, Ohio Court of Common Pleas

PDF

Shaw v. Airbnb, South Carolina State Court

PDF

Slack v. Phoji, Northern District of California

PDF

Smith v. Google, Southern District of Mississippi

PDF

Spiegelman v. Yelp, California Superior Court

PDF

Spivak v. Google, Western District of Washington

PDF

Stark v Google, Northern District of California

PDF

Stein v. YouTube, Southern District of New York

PDF

Stokinger v. Armslist, Massachusetts Superior Court

PDF

Sweet James v Lalazery Law Firm, Central District of California