Document Type
Article
Publication Date
2009
Abstract
Varnum v. Brien is the last case in a line of state constitutional law challenges in what has been a a fifteen-year campaign by LGBT public interest lawyers seeking legal recognition for same-sex couples. While the litigation may be over for now, the larger battle is just beginning. The Iowa Supreme Court’s ruling in Varnum will play a central role in this future battle. It stands as part of a major “moment” in the modern history of recognizing equal marriage rights for same-sex couples. This article describes the historical context in which Varnum was litigated and identifies three important “moments” or shifts in the battle for marriage equality.
Varnum v. Brien is the last case in a line of state constitutional law challenges in what has been a a fifteen-year campaign by LGBT2 public interest lawyers seeking legal recognition for same-sex couples. While the litigation may be over for now,3 the larger battle is just beginning. The Iowa Supreme Court's ruling in Varnum will play a central role in this future battle. It stands as part of a major "moment" in the modem history of recognizing equal marriage rights for same-sex couples. By "moment," I do not mean a single point in time, but a prolonged period of a year or so over which a substantial shift occurs.
I see three key moments in this modem battle for marriage equality. The first distinct moment is the period of time in 1996 surrounding the Hawaii litigation4 and the incipient backlash evidenced by the enactment of various "Defense of Marriage" laws, both at the federal and state level. The second moment occurred in 2003-2004. In that period of time, marriages for lesbian and gay partners became available in Massachusetts, 5 and a handful of mayors around the country (as well as some county commissioners) authorized the issuance of marriage licenses to same-sex couples.6 As a result, the national news media piped footage of the marriage ceremonies of same-sex couples into American households. Many people saw the face of the LGBT community and found it different from the images on prior television coverage of LGBT events. The third moment occurred in 2008- 2009, when legal marriages between same-sex partners became available outside of Massachusetts. The Iowa case is part of this third moment and, in my view, has played a pivotal role in determining the future. This article will provide additional texture for these three "moments" and explain briefly where this current moment is likely to lead.
Automated Citation
13 J. Gender Race & Just. 27