Home > Journals > High Tech > Vol. 40 (2024) > Iss. 2 (2024)
Abstract
In the past two decades, police forces have come to rely on algorithm-based technologies for investigative leads. Several of these technologies are unreliable. They are prone to error, misidentifying suspects, and crimes. When relied upon, they lead to false arrests and unnecessary stop-and-frisks. Yet, there is no coercive mechanism, either regulatory or judicial, that meaningfully governs the use of these algorithmic technologies in law enforcement. As a result, law enforcement agencies are free to disregard potential errors and deploy emerging technologies against communities with little recourse.
This Article looks closely at three technologies—ShotSpotter gunshot detection, facial recognition technology, and rapid DNA machines—to illuminate reliability issues common to privately-held algorithmic technologies and exacerbated by police misuse. Law enforcement agencies fail to screen technologies before using them to support individualized suspicion for searches and seizures. Thus, the police end up targeting criminal defendants based on unreliable information. But the Fourth Amendment does not meaningfully provide defendants with an avenue to challenge the reliability of technologies used to develop probable cause and reasonable suspicion. Extrajudicial regulation is needed to ensure that the technologies used by law enforcement are reliable. If law enforcement agencies continue to deploy unreliable technologies, courts should suppress evidence stemming from their use.
Recommended Citation
Fraerman, Ali,
RELYING ON UNRELIABLE TECH: UNCHECKED POLICE USE OF ALGORITHMIC TECHNOLOGIES,
40 Santa Clara High Tech. L.J. 115
(2024).
Available at: https://digitalcommons.law.scu.edu/chtlj/vol40/iss2/1
Archival Accessibility Statement
This item was created or digitized prior to May 1, 2026, or is a reproduction of legacy media created before that date. It is preserved in its original, unmodified state specifically for research, reference, or historical recordkeeping. In accordance with the ADA Title II Final Rule, the Law Library provides accessible versions of archival materials upon request. To request an accommodation for this item, please submit an accessibility request form.