This Article explores two recent Supreme Court cases—Association of Molecular Pathology v. Myriad Genetics, Inc. and Golan v. Holder—and other intellectual property litigation in the context of the standing doctrine and the public interest.

These cases present significant public policy questions, but the adversarial nature of the courts makes them ill-equipped to consider the multiple public interests and multiple stakeholder perspectives. As a result, adjudication of these cases in the courts results in propertization of the intellectual property interests, the exclusion of non-parties from the formation of policy, and the exhaustion of any further policy debate after the court decision.

This Article discusses these effects and proposes a public-comment mechanism to mitigate the negative consequences.



To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.